PRIORITY SPECIES POOL -- AREA 44
From among the breeding avifauna, a
pool of species may be derived that represents priorities for conservation action within
the physiographic area. Note that a species may be considered a priority for several
different reasons, including global threats to the species, high concern for regional or
local populations, or responsibility for conserving large or important populations of the
species. The different reasons for priority status are represented by levels or tiers. Our
primary means of prioritizing species is through the PIF prioritization scores generated
by Colorado Bird Observatory (Hunter et al. 1993, Carter et al. 2000). This system ranks
species according to seven measures of conservation vulnerability. These include four
global measures (i.e., they do not change from area to area), as well as threats to
breeding populations (TB), area importance (AI), and population trend (PT), which are
specific to each physiographic area. A total rank score is then derived, which is a
measure of overall conservation priority.
There are five entry levels into the priority species pool, as follows:
Tier I. High Continental Priority. -- Species that
are typically of conservation concern throughout their range. These are
species showing high vulnerability in a number of factors, expressed as any
combination of high parameter scores leading to an average score > 3 (the
midpoint); total of 7 parameter scores will be ≥ 22, with AI ≥ 2
(so that species without manageable populations in the region are omitted).
Tier I A. High Continental Priority - High Regional
Responsibility. Species for which this region shares in major
conservation responsibility; i.e., conservation in this region is
critical to the overall health of this species. Species with AI of 3 -
5, or a high percent population (above threshold in II B).
Tier I B. High Continental Priority - Low Regional
Responsibility. Species for which this region can contribute to
rangewide conservation objectives where the species occurs. Species with
AI of 2.
Tier II. High Regional Priority. Species that are of
moderate continental priority, but are important to consider for
conservation within a region because of various combinations of high
parameter scores, as defined below; total of 7 parameter scores = 19-21.
Tier II A. High Regional Concern. Species that are
experiencing declines in the core of their range and that require
short-term conservation action to reverse or stabilize trends. These are
species with a combination of high area importance and declining (or
unknown) population trend; total of 7 parameters = 19-21, with AI + PT
≥ 8.
Tier II B. High Regional Responsibility. Species for
which this region shares in the responsibility for long-term
conservation, even if they are not currently declining or threatened.
These are species of moderate continental priority with a
disproportionately high percentage of their total population in the
region; total of 7 parameters = 19-21, with % population > threshold
(see Appendix 3 in this area's full Plan).
Tier II C. High Regional Threats. Species of moderate
continental priority that are uncommon in a region and whose remaining
populations are threatened, usually because of extreme threats to
sensitive habitats. These are species with high breeding threats scores
within the region (or in combination with high nonbreeding threats
outside the region); total of 7 parameters = 19-21 with TB + TN > 6,
or local TB or TN = 5.
Tier III. Additional Watch List. These species are on the U.S.
National Watch List not included in the above tiers. These species score
highly enough based on global criteria to warrant conservation attention
wherever they occur with an AI of 2 or more.
Tier IV. Additional Federally Listed. Species
listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act receive conservation attention
wherever they occur.
Tier V. Additional State Listed. - Species on state
endangered, threatened, or special concern lists that did not meet any of
above criteria. These are often rare or peripheral populations.
Species that are federally or state listed are noted on
the Priority Species Pool by country and/or state using the following codes: E =
Endangered, T = Threatened, SC = Special Concern, V = Vulnerable.
Note: the Priority
Species Pool and Priority Habitat-suites are excerpted from the associated Physiographic Area Plan.
These tables are also available as a downloadable PDF file.
Priority species pool
for mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, Area 44. Species are presented in
decreasing order of concern. The Partners in Flight total scores and regional
scores were developed from Partners in Flight criteria (Hunter et al. 1994, Carter
et al. 2000). The percent of population was calculated from the percent of range
area, weighted by BBS relative abundance (Rosenberg and Wells 2000). Local status
refers to migratory status. Codes are as follows: B - refers to species that breed
within the region but do not winter (these species are primarily neotropical
migrants but may also include some temperate migrants), D - refers to species that
breed and winter in the region (but possibly different populations), E - refers to
species reaching distributional limits, and R - refers to resident or nonmigratory
species.
|
Entry Level |
Species |
Total Score |
% of Pop |
AI |
PT |
Local Status |
|
I. |
|
A. |
Piping Plover |
29 |
?? |
5 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Saltmarsh Sharp-tailed Sparrow |
29 |
?? |
5 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Seaside Sparrow |
26 |
27.1 |
5 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Prairie Warbler |
25 |
5.9 |
5 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Wood Thrush |
25 |
3.7 |
4 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Kentucky Warbler |
24 |
1.6 |
3 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Worm-eating Warbler |
24 |
2.9 |
3 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Clapper Rail |
23 |
18.9 |
5 |
2 |
D |
|
|
Prothonotary Warbler |
23 |
1.7 |
3 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Whip-poor-will |
23 |
4.0 |
4 |
4 |
B |
|
|
Yellow-throated Vireo |
23 |
< 1 |
3 |
5 |
B |
|
|
American Black Duck |
22 |
1.6 |
4 |
2 |
D |
|
|
Field Sparrow |
22 |
1.5 |
4 |
5 |
D |
|
|
Hooded Warbler |
22 |
1.3 |
3 |
4 |
B |
|
|
Scarlet Tanager |
22 |
2.4 |
4 |
4 |
B |
|
|
American Woodcock |
23 |
< 1 |
3 |
5 |
D |
|
B. |
Red-cockaded Woodpecker |
27 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
R |
|
|
Black Rail |
26 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Cerulean Warbler |
26 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
E |
|
|
Swainson's Warbler |
26 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Henslow's Sparrow |
25 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Bachman's Sparrow |
24 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
E |
|
|
Wilson's Plover |
24 |
?? |
2 |
3 |
B |
|
|
American Oystercatcher |
23 |
?? |
2 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Blue-winged Warbler |
23 |
1.1 |
2 |
4 |
B |
|
|
Brown-headed Nuthatch |
23 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
R |
|
II. |
|
A. |
Eastern Wood-Pewee |
21 |
2.2 |
5 |
4 |
B |
|
|
Marsh Wren |
21 |
< 1 |
3 |
5 |
D |
|
|
Northern Bobwhite |
21 |
1.4 |
4 |
5 |
R |
|
|
Brown Thrasher |
20 |
< 1 |
4 |
4 |
D |
|
|
Chimney Swift |
20 |
1.7 |
4 |
4 |
B |
|
|
Eastern Towhee |
20 |
2.3 |
4 |
5 |
D |
|
|
Gray Catbird |
20 |
2.7 |
4 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Virginia Rail |
20 |
2.3 |
5 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Carolina Chickadee |
19 |
2.4 |
4 |
4 |
R |
|
|
Eastern Kingbird |
19 |
< 1 |
3 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Yellow-billed Cuckoo |
19 |
1.1 |
4 |
4 |
B |
|
B. |
Acadian Flycatcher |
21 |
4.6 |
4 |
2 |
B |
|
|
Black Skimmer |
20 |
6.4 |
4 |
3 |
D |
|
|
Willet |
20 |
4.9 |
5 |
1 |
B |
|
|
Forster's Tern |
19 |
3.0 |
3 |
2 |
B |
|
|
Pine Warbler |
19 |
3.7 |
4 |
2 |
B |
|
C. |
Sedge Wren |
21 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
B |
|
|
Upland Sandpiper |
21 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
E |
|
|
Grasshopper Sparrow |
20 |
< 1 |
2 |
5 |
B |
|
|
Short-eared Owl |
19 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
D |
|
III. |
|
B. |
Chuck-will's-widow |
20 |
1.2 |
3 |
2 |
B |
|
|
Red-headed Woodpecker |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
1 |
D |
|
V. |
|
|
Least Bittern (E-MA, T,-PA) |
18 |
3.6 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Least Tern (E-DE, NJ, PA, SC-MA, VA) |
17 |
2.4 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
Dickcissel (SC-VA) |
20 |
< 1 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
King Rail (E-PA, T-MA) |
20 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Northern Parula (E-DE, T-MA) |
20 |
1.3 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
Brown Pelican (SC-VA) |
19 |
< 1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
Gull-billed Tern (SC-VA) |
19 |
?? |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
American Bittern (E-MA, NJ, T-PA) |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Barn Owl (SC-MA, VA) |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Loggerhead Shrike (E-DE, NJ, PA, T-VA, SC,
MA) |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Long-eared Owl (T-NJ, SC-MA, VA) |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Sandwich Tern (SC-VA) |
18 |
< 1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
Vesper Sparrow (E-NJ, T-MA) |
18 |
< 1 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
Common Tern (E-DE, SC-MA) |
17 |
1.2 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
Cooper's Hawk (E-DE, T-MA, SC-MA) |
17 |
< 1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
Northern Harrier (E-DE, NJ, T-MA, SC-VA) |
17 |
< 1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
Peregrine Falcon (E-MA, NJ, PA, VA) |
17 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Red-eyed Vireo (SC-VA) |
17 |
< 1 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
Sharp-shinned Hawk (SC-MA) |
17 |
< 1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
Tricolored Heron (SC-VA, MA) |
17 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Black-crowned Night-Heron (E-DE, NJ, PA-T,
SC-VA) |
16 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Brown Creeper (E-DE, SC-VA) |
16 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Pied-billed Grebe (E-MA, NJ) |
16 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Red-shouldered Hawk (T-NJ, SC-MA) |
16 |
1.1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
Common Moorhen (SC-MA, VA) |
15 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Eastern Bluebird (SC-MA) |
15 |
1.0 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
Great Blue Heron (SC-MA) |
15 |
1.5 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
Northern Saw-whet Owl (SC-MA, VA) |
15 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Red Crossbill (SC-VA) |
15 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Snowy Egret (SC-MA) |
15 |
1.4 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Spotted Sandpiper (SC-MA) |
15 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Hermit Thrush (SC-VA) |
14 |
< 1 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
Little Blue Heron (SC-MA, VA) |
14 |
< 1 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
Savannah Sparrow (SC-NJ) |
14 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
Barred Owl (T-NJ) |
13 |
< 1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
Great Egret (T-PA, SC-VA, MA) |
13 |
1.5 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
Red-breasted Nuthatch (SC-VA) |
13 |
< 1 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
Cliff Swallow (SC-MA) |
12 |
< 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
PRIORITY HABITAT-SPECIES SUITES -- AREA 44
Priority habitat-species suites for Area
44. TB (threats breeding), AI (area importance), PT
(population trend), and total PIF scores from CBO prioritization database (Carter et al.
2000). Focal species for each habitat in all caps.
|
Habitat |
Species |
Total
score
|
TB |
AI |
PT |
Action level
a |
|
Maritime marshes
|
| |
SALTMARSH
SHARP-TAILED SPARROW |
29 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
II |
| |
Black Rail |
26 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
II |
| |
Seaside Sparrow |
25 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
IV |
| |
AMERICAN BLACK
DUCK |
21 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
II |
| |
American Bittern |
18 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
IV |
| |
Tricolored Heron |
17 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
NORTHERN
HARRIER |
17 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Glossy Ibis |
16 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
V |
| |
Black-crowned Night -Heron |
16 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
V |
| |
Yellow-crowned Night-Heron |
16 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Osprey |
16 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
V |
| |
Great Egret |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Snowy Egret |
14 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Little Blue Heron |
14 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Cattle Egret |
12 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
(Short-eared Owl -- NB) |
?? |
|
|
|
|
|
Beach/ dune |
| |
PIPING
PLOVER |
29 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
II |
| |
American Oystercatcher |
22 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
IV |
| |
ROSEATE
TERN |
19 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
II |
| |
Short-eared Owl |
19 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Common Tern |
15 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Least Tern |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Arctic Tern |
14 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
V |
| |
Horned Lark |
12 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
(IPSWICH SPARROW - NB) |
?? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mature deciduous and mixed forest |
| |
CERULEAN
WARBLER |
25 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
II |
| |
WOOD
THRUSH |
24 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
III |
| |
WORM-EATING
WARBLER |
24 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Baltimore Oriole |
23 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
III |
| |
Black-billed Cuckoo |
23 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
III |
| |
BLACK-THROATED BLUE WARBLER |
23 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
LOUISIANA
WATERTHRUSH |
22 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
IV |
| |
Scarlet Tanager |
22 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
III |
| |
Kentucky Warbler |
22 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Rose-breasted Grosbeak |
21 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
III |
| |
Blackburnian Warbler |
21 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
III |
| |
Canada Warbler |
21 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Eastern Wood-pewee |
20 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
III |
| |
Black-and-white Warbler |
20 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
III |
| |
Northern Parula |
19 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Hairy Woodpecker |
19 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
III |
| |
Purple Finch |
19 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
III |
| |
Northern Goshawk |
19 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Red-shouldered Hawk |
17 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Long-eared Owl |
16 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Sharp-shinned Hawk |
16 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Cooper's Hawk |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Barred Owl |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
|
Early successional shrub/ pitch pine barren |
| |
GOLDEN-WINGED
WARBLER |
27 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
II |
| |
BLUE-WINGED WARBLER |
26 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
III |
| |
Prairie Warbler |
24 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
III |
| |
AMERICAN
WOODCOCK |
22 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
III |
| |
Chuck-will's-widow |
21 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Red-headed Woodpecker |
20 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
EASTERN
TOWHEE |
19 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
III |
| |
Whip-poor-will |
19 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Yellow-breasted Chat |
18 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
IV |
|
Grassland/agricultural |
| |
UPLAND
SANDPIPER |
22 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
III |
| |
GRASSHOPPER
SPARROW |
19 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
III |
| |
BOBOLINK |
18 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
IV |
| |
Vesper Sparrow |
17 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
III |
| |
Northern Harrier |
17 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Barn Owl? |
16 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Savannah Sparrow |
15 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
V |
| |
Horned Lark |
12 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
(Short-eared Owl) |
?? |
|
|
|
|
|
Urban/suburban |
| |
CHIMNEY
SWIFT |
21 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
III |
| |
PEREGRINE
FALCON |
18 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
II |
| |
Purple Martin? |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Common Nighthawk |
15 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
|
Freshwater wetland -- river/lake |
| |
AMERICAN
BLACK DUCK |
21 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
II |
| |
King Rail |
18 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
American Bittern |
18 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Least Bittern |
17 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Northern Harrier |
17 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
IV |
| |
Osprey |
15 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
IV |
| |
Pied-billed Grebe |
16 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Common Moorhen |
14 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
V |
| |
Great Blue Heron |
13 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
V |
a Action levels: I = crisis; recovery
needed; II = immediate management or policy needed rangewide; III = management to reverse
or stabilize populations; IV = long-term planning to ensure stable populations; V =
research needed to better define threats; VI = monitor population changes only.
Literature Cited
Carter, M. F., W. C. Hunter, D. N. Pashley, and K. V. Rosenberg. 2000. Setting
conservation priorities for landbirds in the united states: the partners in flight
approach. Auk 117:541-548.
Hunter, W. C., M. F. Carter, D. N. Pashley, and K. Barker. 1994. The Partners In Flight
prioritization scheme. Pp. 109-119 in D. Finch and P Stangel (eds.), Status and management
of Neotropical migratory birds. U.S.D.A. General Technical Report RM-229, Rocky Mountain
Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Rosenberg, K. V. and J. V. Wells. 1999. Global perspectives on Neotropical migrant
conservation in the Northeast: Long-term responsibility vs. immediate concern. In R. E.
Bonney, D. Pashley, R. J. Cooper, and L. Niles (Eds.). Strategies for bird conservation:
The Partners in Flight planning process. Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
|